Day 1738

Thursday, Friday.

2007.11012

Far-infrared photometric redshifts: a new approach to a highly uncertain enterprise

Casey

I present a new approach at deriving far-infrared photometric redshifts for galaxies based on their reprocessed emission from dust at rest-frame far-infrared through millimeter wavelengths. Far-infrared photometric redshifts ("FIR-$z$") have been used over the past decade to derive redshift constraints for highly obscured galaxies that lack photometry at other wavelengths like the optical/near-infrared. Most literature FIR-z fits are performed through $\chi^2$minimization to a single galaxy's far-infrared template spectral energy distribution (SED). The use of a single galaxy template, or modest set of templates, can lead to an artificially low uncertainty estimate on FIR-$z$'s because real galaxies display a wide range in intrinsic dust SEDs. I use the observed distribution of galaxy SEDs (for well-constrained samples across $0<z<5$) to motivate a new far-infrared through millimeter photometric redshift technique called MMpz. The MMpz algorithm asserts that galaxies are most likely drawn from the empirically observed relationship between rest-frame peak wavelength, $\lambda_{\rm peak}$, and total IR luminosity, L$_{\rm IR}$; the derived photometric redshift accounts for the measurement uncertainties and intrinsic variation in SEDs at the inferred L$_{\rm IR}$, as well as heating from the CMB at $z>5$. The MMpz algorithm has a precision of $\sigma_{\Delta z/(1+z)}\approx0.3-0.4$, similar to single-template fits, while providing a more accurate estimate of the FIR-$z$ uncertainty with reduced chi-squared of order $\mathcal{O}(\chi^2_{\nu})=1$, compared to alternative far-infrared photometric redshift techniques (with $\mathcal{O}(\chi^2_{\nu})\approx10-10^{3}$).

2007.11554

Relaying swarms of low-mass interstellar probes

Messerschmitt, Rubin, Morrison

Low-mass probes propelled by directed energy from earth are an early option for exploration of nearby star systems. A challenging aspect of such technology is returning scientific observational data to earth. We compare two configurations for achieving this. A direct configuration utilizes optical transmission from the probe to a terrestrial receiver employing a large photon collector. In a relay configuration, probes spaced at uniform intervals act as regenerative repeaters for the scientific data, which eventually arrives at a terrestrial receiver from the most recently launched probe. A number of advantages and disadvantages of the relay configuration are discussed. A numerical comparison approximates equal probe mass in the two cases by using the same optical transmit power and equivalent total transmit plus receive aperture area. When the total downlink data rate is equal, the relay configuration benefits from a smaller terrestrial receive collector, but also requires very frequent launches to achieve higher data rates due to the limitations on relay probe receive aperture area. The direct configuration can achieve higher data rates without such frequent launches by increasing terrestrial collector area. A single-point failure problem in the relay configuration can be addressed by introducing relay-bypass modes, but only at the expense of further increases in launch rate or reductions in data volume, as well as a considerable increase in design and operational complexity. Taking into account launch and collector area costs, the direct configuration is found to achieve lower overall cost by a wide margin over a range of cost parameter values and data rates.