1907.09500
deepCR: Cosmic Ray rejection with deep learning
Zhang, Bloom
Cosmic ray (CR) identification and removal are critical components of imaging and spectroscopic reduction pipelines involving solid-state detectors. We present deepCR, a deep learning based framework for cosmic ray (CR) identification and subsequent image inpainting based on the predicted CR mask. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we have trained and evaluated models on Hubble Space Telescope ACS/WFC images of sparse extragalactic fields, globular clusters, and resolved galaxies. We demonstrate that at a reasonable false positive rate of 0.5%, deepCR achieves close to 100% detection rates in both extragalactic and globular cluster fields, and 91% in resolved galaxy fields, which is a significant improvement over current state-of-the-art method, LACosmic. Compared to a well-threaded CPU implementation of LACosmic, deepCR mask predictions runs up to 6.5 times faster on CPU and 90 times faster on GPU. For image inpainting, mean squared error of deepDR predictions are 20 times lower in globular cluster fields, 5 times lower in resolved galaxy fields, and 2.5 times lower in extragalactic fields, compared to the best performing non-neural technique. We present our framework and trained models as an open-source Python project, with a simple-to-use API.
1907.09561
The future of Exoplanet direct detection
Monnier, et al
Diffraction fundamentally limits our ability to image and characterize exoplanets. Current and planned coronagraphic searches for exoplanets are making incredible strides but are fundamentally limited by the inner working angle of a few lambda/D. Some crucial topics, such as demographics of exoplanets within the first 50 Myr and the infrared characterization of terrestrial planets, are beyond the reach of the single aperture angular resolution for the foreseeable future. Interferometry offers some advantages in exoplanet detection and characterization and we explore in this white paper some of the potential scientific breakthroughs possible. We demonstrate here that investments in 'exoplanet interferometry' could open up new possibilities for speckle suppression through spatial coherence, a giant boost in astrometric precision for determining exoplanet orbits, ability to take a census of young giant exoplanets (clusters <50 Myr age), and an unrivaled potential for infrared nulling from space to detect terrestrial planets and search for atmospheric biomarkers. All signs point to an exciting future for exoplanets and interferometers, albeit a promise that will take decades to fulfill.
1907.09583
A realistic roadmap to formation flying space interferometry
Monnier, et al
The ultimate astronomical observatory would be a formation flying interferometer in space, immune to atmospheric turbulence and absorption, free from atmospheric and telescope thermal emission, and reconfigurable to adjust baselines according to the required angular resolution. Imagine the near/mid-infrared sensitivity of the JWST and the far-IR sensitivity of Herschel but with ALMA-level angular resolution, or imagine having the precision control to null host star light across 250m baselines and to detect molecules from the atmospheres of nearby exo-Earths. With no practical engineering limit to the formation's size or number of telescopes in the array, formation flying interferometry will revolutionize astronomy and this White Paper makes the case that it is now time to accelerate investments in this technological area. Here we provide a brief overview of the required technologies needed to allow light to be collected and interfered using separate spacecrafts. We emphasize the emerging role of inexpensive smallSat projects and the excitement for the LISA Gravitational Wave Interferometer to push development of the required engineering building-blocks. We urge the Astro2020 Decadal Survey Committee to highlight the need for a small-scale formation flying space interferometer project to demonstrate end-to-end competency with a timeline for first stellar fringes by the end of the decade.
1907.09866
Measuring bias via the consistency relations of the large scale structure
Marinucci, Nishimichi, Pietroni
Consistency Relations for the Large Scale Structure are exact equalities between correlation functions of different order. These relations descend from the equivalence principle and hold for primordial perturbations generated by single-field models of inflation. They are not affected by nonlinearities and hold also for biased tracers and in redshift space. We show that Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations in the bispectrum in the squeezed limit are suppressed with respect to those in the power spectrum by a coefficient that depends on the bispectrum configuration and on the bias parameter (and, in redshift space, also on the growth rate). We test these relations using large volume N-body simulations and show that they provide a novel way to measure large scale halo bias and, potentially, the growth rate. Since bias is obtained by comparing two directly observable quantities, the method is free from theoretical uncertainties both on the computational scheme and on the underlying cosmological model.
1907.10625
Tensions between the early and the late Universe
Verde, Treu, Riess
The standard cosmological model successfully describes many observations from widely different epochs of the Universe, from primordial nucleosynthesis to the accelerating expansion of the present day. However, as the basic cosmological parameters of the model are being determined with increasing and unprecedented precision, it is not guaranteed that the same model will fit more precise observations from widely different cosmic epochs. Discrepancies developing between observations at early and late cosmological time may require an expansion of the standard model, and may lead to the discovery of new physics. The workshop "Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe" was held at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics on July 15-17 2019 (More details of the workshop (including on-line presentations) are given at the website: https://www.kitp.ucsb.edu/activities/enervac-c19) to evaluate increasing evidence for these discrepancies, primarily in the value of the Hubble constant as well as ideas recently proposed to explain this tension. Multiple new observational results for the Hubble constant were presented in the time frame of the workshop using different probes: Cepheids, strong lensing time delays, tip of the red giant branch (TRGB), megamasers, Oxygen-rich Miras and surface brightness fluctuations (SBF) resulting in a set of six new ones in the last several months. Here we present the summary plot of the meeting that shows combining any three independent approaches to measure H$_0$ in the late universe yields tension with the early Universe values between 4.0$\sigma$ and 5.8$\sigma$. This shows that the discrepancy does not appear to be dependent on the use of any one method, team, or source. Theoretical ideas to explain the discrepancy focused on new physics in the decade of expansion preceding recombination as the most plausible. This is a brief summary of the workshop.
No comments:
Post a Comment